Navigating Ethical Challenges of Generative AI in Tech Products
Key Takeaways
- Potential copyright infringement and ownership of AI-generated content is a real threat - the New York Times Company v. Openai Inc. lawsuit in 2023 shows this.
- Techniques like data bias mitigation, transparency through explainable AI, and sustainable AI practices are likely to become more common in tech companies.
Why Generative AI Ethics Matters in Tech Products
Generative AI ethics matters because it makes sure that AI is used responsibly and doesn't harm people or society.
- It prevents things like AI bias that can lead to unfair treatment
- Will help protect our personal information and privacy
- It can make sure that AI doesn't spread false information
Key Ethical Challenges of Generative AI in Tech
1. Labour Exploitation and Harm to Workers
Generative AI can lead to job displacement in certain sectors, as tasks previously performed by humans become automated. This can result in unemployment and economic hardship for workers.
Why? Well, people, like writers and artists might lose their jobs because the AI can do the work for cheaper. Additionally, the development of AI models often relies on low-wage workers to label and annotate data, sometimes under exploitative conditions. These workers may face long hours, low pay, and limited job security.
2. Environmental Impact
Training large AI models requires significant computational power, leading to high energy consumption and carbon emissions. This contributes to climate change and environmental degradation.
For instance, the energy used to train a single large language model can be equivalent to the lifetime emissions of several cars. For instance, Google’s GHG emissions were 50% higher in 2023 for its data centers. Furthermore, the production of hardware components for AI systems can have negative environmental impacts due to resource extraction and manufacturing processes.
3. Intellectual Property and Copyright Issues in Generative AI
Generative AI models are trained on massive datasets, which may include copyrighted material.
A lot like copying your friend's homework and saying you did it yourself! This can be a big problem because it's unfair to the original creators. Copyright and IP laws protect people from this.What does this mean? Well, if an AI model generates an image that closely resembles a copyrighted artwork, it could lead to legal disputes. Additionally, there are questions about whether AI-generated content can be copyrighted and who owns the rights to such creations.
4. Creation of Bais, Echo Chambers, and Misinformation in Media
Just like people, AI can be biased too. If the AI learns from data or information that's unfair or untrue, it might create things that are sexist, racist, or just plain wrong.
This is a fact major companies like even SAP acknowledge. This can reinforce harmful stereotypes and contribute to social inequalities.
Moreover, AI-generated content can be used to create echo chambers and spread misinformation, as it can be difficult to distinguish from human-created content.
5. Deceptive Deepfakes and Lack of Regulation With Deepfake Technology
Deepfakes are synthetic media that can realistically replace a person's likeness or voice in a video or audio recording. This technology can be used for malicious purposes, such as creating fake news, spreading propaganda, or impersonating individuals for fraud.
With even organizations like the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) acknowledging their potential influence on the 2024 elections.
On a public level, a deepfake video could be used to damage someone's reputation or manipulate public opinion - this could be used in politics or sensitive court cases potentially fabricating evidence.
6. Lack of Transparency and Accountability
The decision-making processes of generative AI models can be opaque and difficult to understand. This lack of transparency makes it challenging to identify and address biases or errors in the models.
What this does is also raise concerns about accountability, as it can be difficult to decide who is responsible for the actions of an AI system - the creator or the user.
For instance, if an AI model generates harmful content, it may be unclear who is responsible for creating or deploying the model.
7. Violation of Privacy and Data Extraction
Generative AI models are often trained on vast amounts of data, which may include personal information. This raises concerns about privacy violations and the potential for data misuse. For example, an AI model trained on social media data could be used to generate targeted advertising or even identify individuals without their consent.
Additionally, the process of data extraction for AI training can be intrusive and raise ethical concerns about surveillance and data ownership.
Strategies to Navigate Ethical Challenges in Generative AI
- Data Bias Mitigation: Employ techniques like data augmentation and re-sampling to balance underrepresented groups in training data. Develop tools to analyze and visualize biases in datasets and model outputs. This allows for the identification and correction of skewed representations.
- Transparency and Explainability: Use explainable AI (XAI) techniques to make the decision-making processes of AI models more understandable. This helps identify biases and errors, addressing the "black box" problem. Document datasets used in training, including their sources and potential biases. This promotes transparency and allows for scrutiny of the AI's foundation.
- Copyright and IP Protection: Develop AI models that can recognize and respect copyrighted material. This prevents AI from generating content that infringes on existing works. Exploring blockchain technology to track the provenance of AI-generated content and establish clear ownership rights can possibly be a better solution later on.
- Combating Misinformation and Deepfakes: Develop AI models that can detect deepfakes and other forms of synthetic media. This helps prevent the spread of misinformation and manipulation. Adding authentication and verification systems for online content.
- Environmental Sustainability: Develop more energy-efficient AI models and training methods to reduce carbon emissions. This addresses the growing environmental impact of AI, considering the "five cars lifetime emissions" from a single model training. Aside from this moving towards renewable energy will help in this in the long run.
- Privacy Preservation: Using techniques like differential privacy and federated learning to train AI models on data without compromising individual privacy. This allows AI development while protecting sensitive information. Other than this, data anonymization and pseudonymization techniques to protect personal data used in AI training - can remove this risk as well.
Generative AI Ethics Laws and Global Frameworks
Different countries are taking different approaches to regulating AI. Some, like the US, are focusing on letting companies figure things out on their own, with some guidelines to follow. Others, like China, have stricter rules to make sure AI follows their laws and values.
This means that what's okay in one country might not be okay in another. For example, some countries might have rules about what kind of information AI can use, while others might not.
Existing AI Ethics Laws and Policies
Right now, there aren't many laws specifically about AI ethics. Many countries have general rules about privacy, safety, and fairness that also apply to AI.
These laws are a starting point, but they might not cover all the tricky situations that AI can create.
Emerging and Needed AI Ethics Laws and Policies
There are several federal laws that are yet to be enacted like the AI Research Innovation and Accountability Act and The Draft No FAKES Act which are two emerging AI regulations, yet to be passed and are only proposed.
In the near future there might be laws about how AI can be used in healthcare or self-driving cars. However, it is important that we create laws that encourage innovation while also protecting people.
Case Studies: Companies Tackling Ethical Challenges
Google Created a Double-Check Response Feature in Gemini
Google's Gemini now has a "double-check response" feature to help users verify the accuracy of its AI-generated answers. This feature allows users to quickly compare Gemini's responses with information found on the web.
This tool aims to increase transparency and trust in Gemini's responses, allowing users to make more informed decisions about the information they receive. By providing this feature, Google acknowledges that AI models can sometimes make mistakes and empowers users to critically look into the information provided and generated
The New York Times Company v. Openai Inc.
The New York Times sued OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT because they felt OpenAI was using their news articles without permission to train their AI. They said this was like stealing their work and that OpenAI should pay them for it. This case is still ongoing, but it shows how important it is to figure out who owns information and how AI can use it fairly.
The outcome of this case could have a big impact on how AI companies access and use data in the future.
Another issue in this case is transparency. The New York Times argues that it is difficult to understand how OpenAI's models are using their content, making it hard to assess potential copyright infringement.
Canadian News Outlets v. OpenAI
Similar to the New York Times case, several Canadian news companies are also suing OpenAI for using their articles to train ChatGPT without permission. They argue that OpenAI is profiting from their work without paying them, which is unfair. This case shows that these issues are not limited to one country and that international laws and agreements might be needed to address them.
This case also raises concerns about the potential impact of AI on the news industry. If AI models can generate news articles without human journalists, it could disrupt the traditional business models of news organizations. This highlights the broader societal impact of AI and the need to consider its effects on various industries and professions.
How Does Entrans Tackle Ethical Challenges in Generative AI?
- Transparent and Accountable AI – At Entrans we insist that AI companies document training data sources, use explainable AI techniques, and establish clear accountability frameworks to prevent bias and misinformation.
- Safeguarding Intellectual Property – In developing your generative AI model Entrans makes sure that you prioritize your information sources and avoid blatant plagiarism. This is done with clear mechanisms to attribute, compensate, or restrict the use of protected material.
- Reducing Environmental Impact – Although this is lowering with smarter AI models - At Entrans based on need we also opt for using energy-efficient AI models. This alongside sustainable computing practices can help curb carbon emissions from large-scale AI training.
How Do You Handle the Ethical Challenges of Generative AI
As mentioned above being transparent about your process and information sources is the first place to start. But aside from this working with AI experts can help you navigate the emerging roadblocks in the AI industry.
With a team of seasoned AI experts Entrans, exposes hidden biases in training data, making sure that your AI-driven decisions are fair and accountable. Moreover, we help avoid costly legal battles through proper compliance frameworks. Want to know more about the Ethical use of AI? Reach out for any Gen AI and tech-related doubts!
Stay ahead with our IT Insights

Discover Your AI Agent Now!
An AI Agent Saved a SaaS Company 40 Hours in a Week!